This was the speech Saga Heritage Foundation chairman, professor Torgrim Titlestad gave at the Roskilde Cathedral 27. January 2025, in connection with the Foundation’s visit to the King’s sarcophagus during our recent COSCAN meeting.
King Frederick III of Denmark. Portrait by Karel van Mander III. Source: Wikipedia
As we gather today around the sarcophagus of the Danish King Frederick III in Roskilde Cathedral on January 27, 2025, we do not aim to recall his general reign, but rather the cultural characteristics that distinguish him in Nordic history. He unexpectedly became King of Denmark in 1648 when his older brother, the reigning king, passed away. Unprepared, he had to take on the responsibilities of kingship despite his passion for studying history and the refined arts of culture. He ruled until his death in 1670.
At this abrupt crossroads in his life, Denmark gained a king who would have an unexpectedly significant impact on the preservation and importance of the Old Norse sagas. The king surrounded himself with advisors and competent individuals who could assess the history of the Nordic region. While he naturally desired a strong Danish historical narrative, he also took an interest in Norway, which was under his rule. However, in 1662, he lacked a scholar to undertake the task of writing Norway’s history. The King sought the assistance of Henrik Bielke (1615-1683), who governed Iceland and was of Norwegian descent. Bielke advised the king to appoint the young Icelander Tormod Torfæus (1636–1719) as his historian with a focus on Norway. It is possible that Bielke was aware of Torfæus' strong engagement with Norwegian saga history, though the documents do not specify this. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that the king had found an exceptionally gifted writer.
King Frederick III and Torfæus developed an unusually strong rapport, and sources indicate that the king frequently visited Torfæus in his office at the Palace. There, Torfæus was tasked with writing a grand work on Norway’s history in Latin. The king was keen to stay informed about Torfæus’ ongoing historical discoveries. Torfæus' charismatic demeanor and intense work ethic fostered a close relationship between the two, to the extent that the king even requested him to teach his son Danish, as German and French were the primary court languages.
One of the fascinating aspects of the king was his curiosity about Norwegian history. Another was his open-mindedness when an intense conflict arose among Danish historians due to Torfæus' research. Torfæus challenged the prevailing belief that the first Danish king was named Dan — a notion deemed unshakable by Danish academics. Outraged, they opposed Torfæus’ reference to Icelandic saga sources, which identified the first Danish king as Skjold. Powerful figures in Denmark urged the king to dismiss Torfæus from his position as historian and pressured him to intervene against what they saw as heresy against the established Danish belief.
To their astonishment, King Frederick III invited the young Torfæus for a discussion on the matter, giving him the opportunity to present his sources and arguments. Even more to the horror of the academic elite, the king was convinced by Torfæus’ findings and asked him to compile a written account of the issue: Series Dynastarum et Regum Daniæ (The Dynasty and Kings of Denmark). As stated in Illustreret Dansk Litteraturhistorie from Gyldendal: “The manuscript was presented to the King, who read it with great interest and gave it his approval.”
Many leading Danes were in shock that the king had yielded to a young Icelander from the distant and "insignificant" Iceland. Through his personal intervention in favor of Torfæus, King Frederick III ensured that Torfæus could complete his work on Norway’s history (Historia rerum Norvegicarum). The king’s decision also had an immense impact on spreading interest in Flateyjarbók among Latin-reading scholars worldwide. He also deserves praise for carefully preserving the only manuscript of Flateyjarbók from Iceland, a unique document he received from the Icelandic bishop Brynjólfur Sveinsson in 1662—through Tormod Torfæus.
As I stand here at the grave of King Frederick III, I wish to express my gratitude that here rests a king and statesman who did not allow rumors and dogma from high-ranking individuals to dictate his understanding of historical truth. He should also be honored for his efforts in preserving manuscripts that might otherwise have been lost forever. In matters of intellectual integrity and preservation, he remains an enduring role model for those of us working with complex historical questions.
Professor Titlestad and the COSCAN group gathered at the King’s final resting place in the magnificent Roskilde Cathedral.
King Frederick III’s sarcophagus, Roskilde Cathedral.